TENDER LOVING TOUCH HOME HEALTH, INC
A home health agency in Hawthorne, CA. It ran an operating surplus of 44.0% in FY23 on $0.6M of operating revenue. It held 0 days of cash on hand (10th percentile of 5,749 home health agencies on liquidity, FY23 pool). Operating margin improved from 2.3% in FY20 to 44.0% in FY23. Its within-stay preventable hospitalization runs 9.7%.
Where TENDER LOVING TOUCH sits among home health agencies
Operating margin · FY23 pool · n = 6,828 of 7,624 filedEach point is one home health agency in the national FY23 distribution for this provider type, placed by operating margin. Facilities are not matched on size, case mix, or market; that is the matched-peer comparison in the paid benchmark. The home health agency FY23 median is +3.1%. Descriptive context only, not a ranking.
The money
$ thousands · HCRIS cost-report basis · as filed, QA-gatedRatios tell you how this home health agency is doing. Statements tell you what kind of organization it is, and where the money comes from. Every figure below traces to a public cost-report filing, shown as filed. A ratio computes only when every input is reported in the filing (otherwise its cell states which input is Not reported in source); a year whose balance sheet does not reconcile is labeled, and its derived ratios read Astrelis calculation unavailable. Not audited by Astrelis.
| Line item | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient revenue | 1,072 | 812 | 630 |
| Total operating revenue | 1,072 | 812 | 630 |
| Total operating expenses | 1,000 | 623 | 353 |
| Operating income | 72 | 189 | 277 |
| Operating margin % | +6.7% | +23.2% | +44.0% |
| Other non-operating, net | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Net income | 87 | 189 | 277 |
| Net income % | +8.0% | +23.2% | +44.0% |
How it operates
quality & operational context · CMS public reportingThe metrics this home health agency type is judged on: care quality, patient experience, and scale. Each is labeled by provenance class and public source; descriptive context only, never a ranking or adequacy claim. Provenance labels: Reported value is copied from the named public source; Astrelis calculation is a formula applied to unchanged reported inputs, with the formula shown; Illustrative estimate is a benchmark gap, multiplier, or scenario — never a measurement.
Trajectory
The county this home health agency serves
44.0% operating margin — 98th percentile of 6,828 peers (FY23 pool).
What changed, what matters, and what your board should ask — every figure sourced to the public record.
Reserve The Board Briefing →A facility-specific dollar comparison cannot be calculated because a benchmark input was not reported. The report still includes all available facility measures, peer benchmarks, and a source-coverage inventory.
Reserve Performance Benchmark Report →How we calculated this
Operating margin vs its peer pool: FY23 pool · n = 6,828.
The Board Briefing
Your facility and its world, board-ready. Measures the public record does not carry become findings, never a decline reason.
Home Health Performance Benchmark
Utilization-pattern and cost benchmarks against matched peers. Directional screens; public data cannot fully control for acuity.