462553-Bridge Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Kaysville, UT. It ran an operating surplus of 4.8% in FY24 on $3.8M of operating revenue. It held 19 days of cash on hand (46th percentile of 1,173 dialysis facilities on liquidity, FY24 pool). 5 reporting years are on file, but revenue scale shifts too much between them for a like-for-like trend, so trend context is limited.
Where 462553-Bridge Dialysis sits among dialysis facilities
Operating margin · FY24 pool · n = 6,811 of 7,176 filedEach point is one dialysis facility in the national FY24 distribution for this provider type, placed by operating margin. Facilities are not matched on size, case mix, or market; that is the matched-peer comparison in the paid benchmark. The dialysis facility FY24 median is +13.7%. Descriptive context only, not a ranking.
The money
$ thousands · HCRIS cost-report basis · as filed, QA-gatedRatios tell you how this dialysis facility is doing. Statements tell you what kind of organization it is, and where the money comes from. Every figure below traces to a public cost-report filing, shown as filed. A ratio computes only when every input is reported in the filing (otherwise its cell states which input is Not reported in source); a year whose balance sheet does not reconcile is labeled, and its derived ratios read Astrelis calculation unavailable. Not audited by Astrelis.
| Line item | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient revenue | 639 | 2,423 | 3,764 |
| Total operating revenue | 639 | 2,423 | 3,764 |
| Total operating expenses | 790 | 2,489 | 3,585 |
| Operating income | (152) | (65) | 179 |
| Operating margin % | -23.8% | -2.7% | +4.8% |
| Other non-operating, net | 22 | 0 | 0 |
| Net income | (130) | (65) | 179 |
| Net income % | -19.8% | -2.7% | +4.8% |
How it operates
quality & operational context · CMS public reportingThe metrics this dialysis facility type is judged on: care quality, patient experience, and scale. Each is labeled by provenance class and public source; descriptive context only, never a ranking or adequacy claim. Provenance labels: Reported value is copied from the named public source; Astrelis calculation is a formula applied to unchanged reported inputs, with the formula shown; Illustrative estimate is a benchmark gap, multiplier, or scenario — never a measurement.
Trajectory
State context
4.8% operating margin — 30th percentile of 6,811 peers (FY24 pool).
What changed, what matters, and what your board should ask — every figure sourced to the public record.
Reserve The Board Briefing →How we calculated this
Operating margin vs its peer pool: FY24 pool · n = 6,811.
Performance Benchmark Report: FY24 peer pool · n = 6,811 · conservative low band; acuity limits stated in the report.
The Board Briefing
Your facility and its world, board-ready. Measures the public record does not carry become findings, never a decline reason.