A skilled nursing facility in Langdon, ND. It ran an operating loss of 26.7% in FY24 on $4.7M of operating revenue. It held 344 days of cash on hand (97th percentile among SNFs on liquidity). Operating margin declined from -15.3% in FY21 to -26.7% in FY24. On care, it carries a 1-star CMS quality rating. Its potentially-preventable readmissions runs 10.7%. On the filed record it is running at an operating loss with lower measured quality. Source-reported context, not a recommendation.
Overall Five-Star
1
Verified fact2025
Source: CMS Care Compare
Days cash on hand · FY24
344d
all sources
▲ 47.9 days vs FY23
vs SNFs97th pctl of 10,767 (FY25)
Operating margin · FY24
-26.7%
▼ 7.3 pts vs FY23
vs SNFs6th pctl of 12,481 (FY25)
Total operating revenue · FY24
$4.7M
▼ 0.8 $M vs FY23
vs SNFs10th pctl of 12,880 (FY25)
Where Maple Manor Care sits among SNFs
Operating margin · FY25 pool · n = 12,481 of 13,901 filed
Each point is one SNF in the national distribution for this provider type, placed by operating margin. Facilities are not matched on size, case mix, or market — that is the matched-peer comparison in the paid benchmark. The SNF median is +1.0%. Descriptive context only, not a ranking.
One snfMaple ManorSNF median
The money
$ thousands · HCRIS cost-report basis · as filed, QA-gated
Ratios tell you how this skilled nursing facility is doing. Statements tell you what kind of organization it is, and where the money comes from. Every figure below traces to a public cost-report filing, shown as filed. A ratio renders only when every input is reported in the filing; a year missing its core lines is not shown; a year whose balance sheet does not reconcile is labeled. Not audited by Astrelis.
Operating margin
-26.7% (FY24)
Operating income ÷ total operating revenue
HCRIS WS G-3
Total margin
-19.0% (FY24)
Net income ÷ total revenue incl. nonoperating
HCRIS WS G-3
Days cash on hand
344d (FY24)
Cash & investments ÷ daily operating expense
HCRIS WS G / G-3
Current ratio
2.67× (FY24)
Total current assets ÷ current liabilities
HCRIS WS G
Equity financing ratio
36% (FY24)
Total net assets ÷ total assets
HCRIS WS G
Days in net patient A/R
45d (FY24)
Net patient receivables ÷ (net patient revenue ÷ 365), same fiscal year
HCRIS WS G / G-3
$ in thousands
Line item
FY22
FY23
FY24
Patient revenue
4,925
5,542
4,737
Total operating revenue
4,925
5,542
4,737
Total operating expenses
5,710
6,619
6,002
Operating income
(785)
(1,077)
(1,265)
Operating margin %
-15.9%
-19.4%
-26.7%
Other non-operating, net
829
1,493
308
Net income
44
416
(957)
Net income %
+0.8%
+5.9%
-19.0%
HCRIS Worksheet G-3 (SNF) · $ thousands · FY21–FY25 · operating revenue reflects net patient revenue (the SNF form carries no other-operating split) · FY20–21 may include COVID-era relief funding in other income
How it operates
quality & operational context · CMS public reporting
The metrics this skilled nursing facility type is judged on: care quality, patient experience, and scale. Each is labeled by evidence class and public source; descriptive context only, never a ranking or adequacy claim.
Overall Five-Star
1
Verified fact2025
CMS Care Compare
Health inspection star
2
Verified fact2025
CMS Care Compare
Quality measure star
2
Verified fact2025
CMS Care Compare
Potentially-preventable readmissions
10.7%
Proxy2026
CMS SNF QRP
Occupancy
76.0%
Verified fact2025
HCRIS WS S-1 (SNF cost report)
Trajectory
Cost-report basis · 5 reporting years
Operating margin
Days cash on hand
The county this skilled nursing facility serves
Cavalier County, ND · nonmetro, rural, remote
Median household income
$67.1K
vs $82.1K US · $59.7K rural median
Poverty rate
7.7%
vs 12.5% US · 14.3% rural median
Uninsured
3.5%
vs 8.6% US · 8.4% rural median
Age 65+
27.3%
vs 16.8% US · 20.6% rural median
Fair or poor health
17.0%
self-reported, adults · CDC PLACES
Primary-care shortage
Designated
HRSA HPSA
Economic context: 5.3% of county personal income is Medicare/Medicaid medical benefits; 11.2% arrives as government transfers (BEA, 2022).
The Board Briefing$1,000
The free profile shows the record. The Board Briefing tells you what changed, what matters, and what your board should ask. 35+ pages, built entirely from public sources, no client data required. Delivered within 2 business days. If we cannot deliver the published scope for your facility, you pay nothing.
Where this facility is underperforming its matched peer cohort and what that gap is worth, measure by measure. Delivered within 30 days of eligibility confirmation.
