Home health agency · AL
CULLMAN REGIONAL HOME CARE
Source-reported context
CMS / HRSA public data
Not audited by Astrelis
Quality of Patient Care Star Rating
4★
Verified fact
Source: CMS Care Compare
Patient Survey Star Rating
5★
Verified fact
Source: CMS Care Compare
Improvement in Ambulation
89.1%
Verified fact2026
Source: CMS Care Compare
Timely Initiation of Care
98.8%
Verified fact2026
Source: CMS Care Compare
Where CULLMAN REGIONAL HOME sits among peers
Quality of patient care star · n = 97 sampleEach point is one home health agency in the like-for-like sample cohort, placed by quality of patient care star. Distribution is descriptive context only, not an ordered ranking.
One home health agencyCULLMAN REGIONAL HOMESample median
CohortHome health agency · n = 97Like-for-like only (home health agency ↔ home health agency)
Distribution axisQuality of patient care starDescriptive context, not a ranking
EvidenceEvery metric labeledVerified fact · proxy · context, each with its public source
Quality & ratings
Improvement in Bathing
93.4%
Hhcahps Domain Measures
5★
Hhcahps Professional Care Percent
93.0%
Hhcahps Communication Percent
90.0%
Hhcahps Medicines Pain Safety Percent
90.0%
Hhcahps Overall Care 9 Or 10 Percent
94.0%
Hhcahps Definitely Recommend Percent
88.0%
Hhcahps Survey Response Rate
29.0%
Hhvbp Annual Performance
34.58
Hhvbp Discharge To Community
72.2%
Hhvbp Dyspnea Improvement
92.2%
Hhvbp Overall Rating
89.748★
Hhvbp Willingness To Recommend
84.1%
Quality Period
2026-04
Utilization & scale
Hh Pac Service Days
5,860
Service context
Dyspnea Improvement
90.9%
Potentially Preventable Hospitalization
9.1%
Served Zip Count
30
Medicare Pac Utilization
738
Hh Pac Distinct Beneficiaries
326
Ownership
Owner Count
8
Ownership
NON-PROFIT
Primary Owner Name
DANA MARTIN
Finance
not shown for this provider typeA hospital-style income statement and balance sheet is intentionally not shown for home health agencys. The public sources for this provider type do not support presenting full statements or a margin conclusion, so we show identity, operational, and community context instead. This is a deliberate guardrail, not missing data.