PHSC-GRAMBLING FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
A health center in LA. It ran an operating surplus of 41.2% in FY23 on $0.5M of operating revenue. Operating margin improved from 10.9% in FY20 to 41.2% in FY23.
Where PHSC-GRAMBLING FAMILY HEALTH sits among health centers
Operating margin · FY23 pool · n = 1,112 of 4,110 filedEach point is one health center in the national distribution for this provider type, placed by operating margin. Facilities are not matched on size, case mix, or market — that is the matched-peer comparison in the paid benchmark. The health center median is -36.6%. Descriptive context only, not a ranking.
Appendix: the Medicare cost-report view
$ thousands · HCRIS cost-report basis · as filed, QA-gatedRead this first: this is a partial, Medicare-centric view. Health centers are grant-funded: HRSA Section 330 grants, Medicaid, and sliding-fee revenue dominate their finance and are not on this cost report, which carries only an income statement. A thin or negative cost-report margin here is not whole-organization distress; the organization-level picture is the UDS section above.
Ratios tell you how this health center is doing. Statements tell you what kind of organization it is, and where the money comes from. Every figure below traces to a public cost-report filing, shown as filed. A ratio renders only when every input is reported in the filing; a year missing its core lines is not shown; a year whose balance sheet does not reconcile is labeled. Not audited by Astrelis.
| Line item | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient revenue | 696 | 571 | 523 |
| Total operating revenue | 696 | 571 | 523 |
| Total operating expenses | 731 | 469 | 307 |
| Operating income | (35) | 103 | 215 |
| Operating margin % | -5.0% | +18.0% | +41.1% |
| Other non-operating, net | 456 | 469 | 477 |
| Net income | 421 | 572 | 692 |
| Net income % | +36.5% | +55.0% | +69.2% |
How it operates
quality & operational context · CMS public reportingThe metrics this health center type is judged on: care quality, patient experience, and scale. Each is labeled by evidence class and public source; descriptive context only, never a ranking or adequacy claim.